"...The question, “By what standard?”
really is a fundamental question. The same question arises in disputes
on many playgrounds—it's the same thing as asking, “Who says?” If you
claim that I have to do something, the question should come back, "Why
do I have to do this?"...
During our three days together making Collision,
this was one of the few times where Christopher was brought up short. I
think it was because the question here was a complete novelty for him,
and he needed a moment to think about it.
When he tries to answer the “By what standard?” question, notice how
he smuggles in the assumption that I am asking him to prove. He says
that he knows certain (moral) realities because he is among the “higher
primates.” But there is a word in there that is value-laden—higher. Higher by what standard? What are we talking about?
Christopher set up the next exchange nicely by acknowledging that as
primates, we have a jumble of conflicting instincts. The response I
offered was something I first learned from C.S. Lewis.
If I have two competing and contradictory instincts, an evolutionary
approach can account for each of those instincts (say, self-preservation
and herd preservation). What it cannot account for is a third instinct
that tells me which of the first two instincts I ought to obey in this
instance. I do not have an “umpire” instinct that decides between them.
What I do have is a conscience, which cannot be accounted for apart
from God. Christopher tries to take a “conscience vote” among the
students there when he brings up the question of eternal torment. But we
don’t need a conscience vote. We need to account for why we have
consciences in the first place."
-
Douglas Wilson discussing
his experience with Christopher Hitchens
No comments:
Post a Comment